Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Washington Post to Staff Twitterers: Watch Your Mouth


When Raju Narisetti tweeted his thoughts about health care reform and term limits — he’s in favor of both — he was well within the ethos of Twitter, where everyone is free to spout off about any old thing. But Mr. Narisetti’s day job as one of two managing editors at The Washington Post means that his use of those 140 characters becomes fraught. After his tweets kicked up a bit of a ruckus, according to The Post’s ombudsman, Andrew Alexander, Mr. Narisetti shut down his Twitter account and The Washington Post issued new guidelines for its employees when they step into the social media fracas. Mr. Alexander explained the problem thusly:
“In today’s hyper-sensitive political environment, Narisetti’s tweets could be seen as one of The Post’s top editors taking sides on the question of whether a health care reform plan must be budget neutral. On Byrd, his comments could be construed as favoring term limits or mandatory retirement for aging lawmakers. Many readers already view The Post with suspicion and believe that the personal views of its reporters and editors influence the coverage. The tweets could provide ammunition.”
Washington Post executive editor Marcus Brauchli issued a memo suggesting that there was nothing casual about tweeting, however easy it is to tap out a sentence and hit send.
“When using these networks, nothing we do must call into question the impartiality of our news judgment. We never abandon the guidelines that govern the separation of news from opinion, the importance of fact and objectivity, the appropriate use of language and tone, and other hallmarks of our brand of journalism.”
It’s enough to give any MSM tweeter pause, or at least a bit of writer’s block. Washington Post columnist Howard Kurtz still found a way to crack-wise within the guidelines, tweeting in response to the new mandates.
“Under new WP guidelines on tweeting, I will now hold forth only on the weather and dessert recipes,” he wrote, and then added, more seriously, “Actually, I always assumed you shouldn’t tweet anything you wouldn’t say in print or on the air. Diff betw having thoughts and being biased.”  Read more here

Sunday, September 27, 2009

25 Ways to Make Friends, Fans, and Followers



So your client or company has set up its social profiles and channels. The big question now is how to build up large communities of friends, fans, and followers. I did a little survey in our office and got a lot of great suggestions -- here are 25 of them. Of course there are more, but this checklist is a good start.

Place a personal ad. Use online media (display banners, Flash ads, widget/gadget ads, etc.) to drive traffic to your social media channels. Facebook pages can make great landing pages. They also let you present very high-value brand interactions that spark viral distribution through existing social technologies.
Start with people who know your company. Add Facebook or Twitter addresses to the bottom of your company's e-mail signature.
Pepper your site. Add calls to action to your site inviting people to become your company's friend, fan, or follower. Put the icons and links on the bottom of every page and in your "contact us" section.
Create a social hub. Make sure your site has a social hub page in the "about us" section that includes calls to action to friend, fan, or follow you and links to your profiles and channels.
Weave your social Web. Make sure your company's Facebook page has links to your Twitter page. Also, periodically tweet the benefits of becoming a fan of your Facebook page.
Give them a reason to join. Tell people what they get by being your company's friend, fan, or follower. Timely industry news, cool content or great offers? What is in it for them?
Shout about it. Drop a press release about the launch of your Facebook page, Twitter micro-blog, or SlideShare channel.
Wrap your product. If you sell packaged goods, make sure your packaging promotes your profiles. If people like you enough to buy your product, give them the chance to connect with you in the places where they want to connect.
Make yourself visible. Join other social networks to establish a well-rounded presence. If you are already on Facebook and Twitter, do you have a Flickr page, SlideShare account, and YouTube channel for your visual content?
Use tools built into social networks. Instead of just listing an event on your Web site, make it Facebook event as well. These tools allow users to interact with your event through RVSP features, photos, and a Wall option. It's more likely someone notices an event in this way than a static calendar on your site.
Be inquisitive. Everyone is fighting for the spotlight on the social Web and no one likes a know-it-all. Ask questions through Twitter and status updates to not only engage your current followers and fans, but help encourage experts to speak up.
Let go of your secrets. Sharing your knowledge with other people breaks down barriers of engagement. Don't sell a success package for $19.99; instead start a blog. (For example...this article!)
Don't give a hard sell. Both Twitter and Facebook are about having a casual conversation with your customers; think Starbucks, not a boardroom. Your corporate brand message in 140 characters will not gain any new fans or followers for most. Instead give information that folks can use day to day that represents your service offering in some manner.
Check the chatter. Use free tools like monitter.com and search for keywords related to your business that Twitter users have used. If they are writing about what you do, start a conversation. Be sure not to use any canned replies. Remember, on Twitter, everything is public.
Daypart. While it may seem odd to some, it's vital to think about when your target clientele is on Facebook or Twitter and what messaging works at a particular part of the day. Do you target the early morning, lunch, or after hours crowd, and with what message?
Remember: location, location, location. Really think about how someone uses your site. It's easy to include chiclets, but if they are not in the right location they can easily be lost in a site's clutter. This can be especially true for sites with heavy advertising such as news sites.
Reach out to key people. There are very influential people on social networks. If you reach out to them in the right way, you can have a great networking experience and prove your worth to others. Find people with a large fan base and see if you can join into their conversation.
Follow trends and join in. Every day on Twitter there are "hot" topics happening. Find out what #hashtags and keywords are being used, and state your opinion. Chances are, hundreds of people are following those conversations and you will instantly be noticed.
Take it offline. Is your Twitter name on your business card? Your Facebook page at the bottom of all letters? How about your print ads and direct mail?
Create a conversation. Don't let your followers and friends feel like you're talking at them instead of with them. When their friends see them interacting with you, they could become a friend or follower as well.
Follow back. If you don't follow people back, you look like someone who only wants to be heard and doesn't care to listen. That's not a good way to build relationships.
Have a consistent stream of content. If you start to go dry, people will forget about you. Having an ongoing flow of content and information allows you to stay at the top of your followers' minds and helps you get noticed. So create a publishing schedule.
Sponsor a contest. People love to win (or the chance to win), and hosting or sponsoring a contest will spur an increase in the number of fans and followers.
Don't spam. Keeping existing friends, fans, and followers is as important as gaining new ones, so do not generate animosity by being one of those annoying social media spammers.
Do not waste friends. This is the big one! Campaign-specific Facebook fan page are a waste. When you are done with the campaign Facebook page, re-skin the page for the next campaign. Do not just abandon the fans you have made. Campaign-specific Facebook pages that end after the campaign are so 2008!


Wednesday, September 23, 2009

STATS: 84% of Social Media Programs Don’t Measure ROI


This article asks a good question: Do you measure ROI on social media promotions? If not, why not? We will spend quite a bit of time discussing measurement tools and strategies in our upcoming class - which starts tonight!  I look forward to meeting you!

From Mashable: We talk a lot about the rapid adoption of social media in a wide array of industries. According to an August 2009 survey by Mzinga and Babson Executive Education, 86% of professionals in a variety fields said that they have adopted social media in some way.

While the survey results are great in that they indicate an enhanced role social media in many industries, it also indicated that some professionals or companies are adopting social technologies without having a way to actually measure how effective or useful the measures actually are. In fact, 84% of respondents said they don’t currently measure the ROI (return on investment) of their social media programs.
Even less encouraging, more than 40% of respondents said they didn’t even know whether they could track ROI from their social tools. This is worrisome because it indicates that industries and professionals are adopting technology without actually taking into account how it will impact their business and what value it will add.

It’s easy to say, “social media will improve customer retention” — and in fact that might be true for a number of businesses, but without proper ways to measure how these tools work, making them more effective and efficient becomes difficult. Moreover, without having an ROI strategy in place, businesses might be more willing to drop social technologies or treat them as a short-term fad. For social media and social technology to really work, businesses need to be able to measure its impact, positive and negative.

How do you or your businesses monitor your social media ROI? If you don’t measure your ROI from social media, why not?



Monday, September 21, 2009

Social Media Governance

This will be a very helpful resource for students in the upcoming Fall Semester of Social Media Marketing:


This database contains 82 documents.

View by industry:

Organization
Title
About.com
Template: Blogging and Social Media Policy
About.com
Template: Internet and Email Policy
American Red Cross
Social Media Handbook for Local Red Cross Units
American Red Cross
Online Communications Guidelines
Associated Press
Social Media Policy
Australian Public Service Commission
Interim Protocols for Online Media Participation
BBC
Editorial Guidelines, personal use of Social Networking
BBC
Use of Social Networking and other third party websites
BBC
Online Services Guidelines in Full
BBYO
Staff/Volunteer Presence on Social Networking Sites
BT
Forum Guidelines
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC)
Facebook Policy
Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR)
Social Media Guidelines
Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR)
Social Media Guidelines for Consultation
Cicso
Internet Postings Policy
City of Seattle
Blogging Policy
Cleveland Clinic
Social Media Policy
Dell
Online Policy
DePaul University
Social Media Guidelines
Dow Jones
Social Media Interaction Policy
Easter Seals
Online Community Guidelines
Electronic Frontier Foundation
How to Blog Safely (About Work or Anything Else)
ESPN
Guidelines for Social Networking
eWay Direct
Social Media Policy
Fairfax County, VA
Facebook Comments Policy
Feedster
Corporate Blogging Policy
Fellowship Church
Personal Website and Weblog Policies
FINRA
Guide to the Internet for Registered Representatives
Gartner
Public Web Participation Guidelines
General Services Administration (GSA)
Social Media Policy
GM
Blogger Policy
Greteman Group
Social Media Policy
Harvard Law School
Terms of Use
Headset Brothers
Social Media Policy
HP
Code of Conduct
IBM
Social Computing Guidelines
IBM
Case Study: The Impact of Corporate Culture on Social Media
InQbation
Government Policy Guidelines
Intel
Social Media Guidelines
International Olympic Committee (IOC)
Blogging Guidelines for Persons Accredited at the Games of the XXIX Olympiad, Beijing 2008
Jaffe
Template: Social Media and Social Networking Policies and Procedures
Judith Lindeau
Template: Social Media Policy for Associations (Real Estate)
LiveWorld
Social Media Content Guidelines
Mayo Clinic
For Mayo Clinic Employees
Media Law Resource Center
Compilation of Legal Actions Against Bloggers
Microsoft
Channel 9 Doctrine
Microsoft
Tweeting Guidelines and Blogging Guidelines
New Zealand State Services Commission
Principles for Interaction with Social Media
New Zealand State Services Commission
The Guide to Online Participation
Opera
Employee Blogging Policy
Plaxo
Communication (Blogging) Policy
Porter Novelli
Our Social Media Policy
Powerhouse Museum
Communication Using Public Facing Museum Blogs - Policy
PR-Squared
Corporate Social Media Policy: Top 10 Guidelines
Rhetorica
Blogging and Comment Policy
RightNow
Social Web Employee Policy
Roanoke County, VA
Social Media Policy
Robert Scoble
Press FAQ
SAP
Social Media Participation Guidelines 2009
Sentara
Social Media Policy
Shift Communications
Top 10 Guidelines for Social Media Participation
Smithsonian Institution
Web and New Media Strategy
Social Media Business Council
Disclosure Policy Toolkit
Sun Microsystems
Guidelines on Public Disclosure
Sun Microsystems
Alumni Blog Aggregation Additional Terms
Telstra
3 Rs of Social Media Engagement
Thomas Nelson
Blogging Guidelines
U.K. Government
Template Twitter Strategy for Government Departments
U.S. Air Force
Air Force Blog Assessment
U.S. Air Force
New Media and the Air Force
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Jacksonville District
Social Media User Guidelines
U.S. Coast Guard
Social Media - The Way Ahead
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Blogging at EPA for Greenversations
U.S. General Services Administration's (GSA) Office of Citizen Services (OCS)
Blog Policies
U.S. Navy
Web 2.0: Utilizing New Web Tools
UK Civil Service
Code for Online Participation
Wal-Mart
Twitter External Discussion Guidelines
Walker Art Center
Blog Guidelines
Webtrends
Social Media Guidelines
Wells Fargo
Community Guidelines
Workplace Fairness
Off-Duty Conduct
Yahoo!
Personal Blogging Policy


Saturday, September 19, 2009

World's 2 most valuable brands: Coca-Cola, IBM


Consumers lost trust in brands this year as the recession deepened, according to an industry report released Thursday, although longtime staples Coca-Cola and IBM retained their spots as the world's two most valuable brands.

This is the first time the combined value of the world's top 100 brands as ranked by Interbrand, a branding agency, has fallen in the 10 years Interbrand has assessed them. 

The list's total value, including brands like Google Inc., Nintendo and Sony, fell 4.6 percent to $1.15 trillion, Interbrand estimates.

"That says something about the environment that we're in, especially when you consider that brands are by nature less volatile than business valuations," said Interbrand CEO Jez Frampton, who called a company's brand its most valuable asset.

The environment -- a recession the likes of which the world hasn't seen for decades -- has eaten away at people's trust in specific brands, starting with financial companies, he said. Consumers even started to question retail brands as stores slashed prices to get sales, leading consumers to wonder about pricing, and why they had to pay so much before.

"All of these things lead you to re-evaluate the nature of the relationships that we have with brands and indeed how confident we feel in brands to live up to the promises they make," he said. "Brands are promises which we value and are prepared to pay for and if we feel those promises have been broken we're less likely to trust."
Brands are more than just names, colors or logos -- think Coca-Cola's red or McDonald's golden arches. A brand includes all the elements of a product or service from its design, ingredients and manufacture to its marketing, advertising and logo.

A well-honed brand evokes in consumers an emotion and a promise of what it will deliver, without the consumer having to do much -- if any -- research, said Allen Adamson, managing director at branding firm Landor Associates. Brands are important for all businesses, and critical in categories that have direct consumer contact, like autos, he said.

"In a cluttered world where people are time-compressed, brands are short cuts to help them make decisions," he said.

Each year, Interbrand ranks companies by the amount of their revenue that is attributable to their brands, using a formula that takes into account the brand's future strength and its role in creating demand, whether among consumers or business customers or both.

The firm assigns a monetary value to each brand and measures annual growth, in this case from July 1, 2008, to June 30, 2009.

Given the recession, it was not surprising to see financial companies posting the steepest decline in their brands' values this year, with drops by American Express (now number 22, down from 15) HSBC (now 32, down from 27), Citi (now 36, down from 19), and UBS (now 72, down from 41). Merrill Lynch and AIG both dropped off the list.

Automakers also dropped in the rankings as their sector's sales slumped in the recession. In addition, major U.S. automakers General Motors Corp. and Chrysler Group LLC received government aid to stay afloat, which generated negative feelings among consumers. Neither of those brands made the top 100 Interbrand list.
Even Toyota's brand -- top-ranked among auto companies at number eight, down from 6 in 2008 -- suffered, while BMW went from 13 to 15, and Ford was unchanged at 49. Honda edged up two slots to 18.
Despite the economic uncertainty, the top 10 brands this year stayed relatively stable, with Coca-Cola Co. in the first slot, a place it has held since the rankings started in 2000. The soft-drink maker retains its recognition around the world, Frampton said, and it has been releasing new products as it hopes to woo consumers shifting to healthier juices and teas.

Coca-Cola's brand value rose 3 percent in 2009 to $68.73 billion, while IBM's gained 2 percent to $60.21 billion.

The technology giant, often known as "Big Blue," also rolled out new products that increased the value of its brand in 2009, according to the report. The company -- which sells computer servers, software and technical services to businesses -- received more than 4,000 U.S. patents during the period, marking the 16th straight year it has received the most.

Rolling out new products keeps customers interested and spending, even in a recession, Frampton said. Companies can't be idle when times are tough, he warned.

"Innovation is the bedrock of any successful company in the future," he said. "Nobody can stand still nowadays."

The remaining brands in the top five all lost value but retained their ranks from last year. Microsoft's brand value fell 4 percent to $56.64 billion to take third, while General Electric's value fell 10 percent to $47.77 billion for fourth. Nokia lost 3 percent to place fifth at $34.86 billion.
The value of online giant Google's brand grew the fastest in the world again, rising 25 percent to $31.98 billion to place seventh, up from 10th place last year and 20th the year before. Frampton said the company's brand growth is "miraculous," though the report notes that as it gets bigger, "it has to deal with the inevitable mistrust and ugliness ascribed to being a very large, diversified and very profitable company."

But Deborah Mitchell, executive fellow at the Center for Brand and Product Management at Wisconsin School of Business, thinks Google already has found balance by earning consumers' trust even as it becomes nearly omnipresent in their lives.

That's partly due to Google's value statement -- "Do no evil" -- which resonates with consumers, especially in a downturn, she said. Mitchell said consumers are increasingly focusing on a company's values and don't want to associate with businesses whose values they question.

"There's been a shift in the focus on values and not just economics to consumers," she said. "They're looking more closely at who is selling them what."

Friday, September 18, 2009

18 observations on Twitter and SEO




Posted 10 August 2009 14:09pm by Chris Lake with 13 comments
I’m not one of those people who claims that social media doesn’t do anything for your search results. On the contrary, I think it absolutely helps SEO.

In any event, Twitter can also directly affect Google rankings for you in a positive way, starting with universal search...
Twitter helps you claim your universal search placements
It is crucial to own / control as many first page search results for your own company / brand name. Sites like YouTube, Slideshare and LinkedIn are easy wins, as far as universal search goes. Twitter is another way of claiming one of these slots. Twitter is always in the first five results for a Google search on 'Econsultancy'.

Twitter can do amazing things for generic keyphrases
Seriously amazing things. Read my analysis of how Mahalo came out of nowhere to rank highly for ‘answers’, to support Mahalo Answers (which only launched in December 2008). It did this by setting up www.twitter.com/answers. There are half a billion results for the word ‘answers’, and the Mahalo Twitter account sits at the top of the second page.

Frequency matters
Mahalo made Twitter a part of its business: you can ask questions via Twitter, and it posts answers via Twitter. This was a smart move, not least because it encourages a lot more activity. In eight months @answers has posted almost 54,000 tweets. Ask yourself whether 54,000 tweets and a third placed result on Google (for a ridiculously popular keyword) is a coincidence? Personally, I don’t think so.

  • Consider that there are 54,000 individual pages on Twitter all pointing at @answers, as well as to Mahalo Answers.
  • One tweet = one page; one page = one link to the homepage, and one link to the source of the tweet client (e.g. ‘Tweetdeck, or in this case ‘Mahalo Answers’).
More followers help
Points make prizes. More followers help create more internal linklove to your Twitter homepage, as well as to individual tweets. Frequency and reach!

Some outbound links are Nofollowed…
Big deal. Step back and see the bigger picture. Twitter drives reach and awareness in what you’re up to. It’s as much about encouraging your followers to spread word – and create new links - on other sites that do not bother with Nofollow. Andy Beal has some good ideas on why Twitter and Google need to dump the Nofollow protocol.

Retweets create linklove and awareness
This follows on from the last point. By creating compelling / useful / valuable content you can generate a lot of retweets, which – for link-based tweets – can mean lots of visitors. Traffic is one thing, but again it’s about the bigger picture. We live in a world of bookmarklets, and there is a large blogger community on Twitter. Links, links, links. One of my posts on measuring social media success generated more than 1,000 retweets, which in turn delivered 30,000+ visitors. Those people also wrote about it and bookmarked it on sites like Delicious (about 600 times), StumbleUpon, Sphinn, Digg and FriendFeed, which in turn generated yet more traffic, links, interest, and Econsultancy subscriptions / registered users.

Don’t panic if you failed to claim your brand on Twitter
Your Twitter URL (e.g @lakey) is important, but it’s not make or break. Hopefully you’ll have claimed your first choice name by now (note that I didn’t grab mine, alas). This matters a lot more if it’s for your company or brand name, but it’s not the end of the world in SEO terms because…

Twitter usernames are optimised for SEO
Your username (e.g. ‘Chris Lake’) is where the money's at, so to speak. Your brand name / keywords should live here. Twitter recently optimised the username to display the username first, so in Google you’ll see ‘Chris Lake (lakey) on Twitter’. Very helpful.

Some URL shorteners are better than others
301 redirects are what you're looking for. I use Bit.ly, which works very well and provides permanent 301 redirection on its links. Others aren’t so generous, willing, or able. Search Engine Land has a great chart to help you choose one.

And some 'URL shorteners' are horrible
There is a horrifying trend towards 'framebars', which sit at the top of the page and make your world slightly worse. They can have all manner of implications on SEO, not to mention the user experience. The Digg URL shortener is one that has put Digg firmly into ‘jump the shark’ territory for me, and created controversy a few weeks ago. It’s like a nuclear arms race, when everybody involved should know better.

Customising URL shortener extensions is only good for users
Many of the URL shortening services allow you to customise the link (e.g. ‘Bit.ly/customisethisbit’) but it’s not going to help with SEO specifically (due to the nature of the redirection). It might help persuade humans to click the link, but that’s the long and short of it, as far as I can tell.

Contextual tweeting helps
Go niche for the best results. This is about attracting the right audience, as much as anything. When you’ve got them try not to alienate them with too many off-topic tweets. Help people quickly figure out what you’re all about, when they browse your Twitter feed. And it’s the same with Googlebot, right? If context matters on blogs, websites and web pages then I’d wager it matters for Twitter too. A liberal sprinkling of keywords and phrases won’t do you any harm...

Individual tweets can rank highly
Twitter is about sub-folders (e.g. 'twitter.com/lakey') rather than sub-directories (e.g. 'lakey.twitter.com'), so Google love is passed down through to tweets. As such we’re seeing individual tweets ranking relatively highly in Google, typically for long tail phrases.

Integrate Twitter with your website and beyond
Prop it up. Give your Twitter homepage some linklove from your site. Let your audience see it and help them embrace it. Our own Twitter experiment, rolled out on a whim one Friday in March, was based around the notion that we’ll let people talk about us on Twitter and then feature their tweets on our homepage. We then tweaked the code to pull in mentions of specific blog articles (these sit in the blog sidebar, labeled ‘Twitter Buzz’). Further integration is planned. It is about driving engagement and participation, on our site and on Twitter, and also acts as a great feedback channel. All of this helps feed some of the other things I’ve talked about.

Add your account to Twitter directories
A no-brainer. Start with WeFollow and then check out some others

Optimise your bio
The Twitter API allows third party websites / apps / directories to pull through this information. And this is precisely what Google uses as the description alongside your search listing. Here’s mine, and this is exactly what it looks like in Google: ‘Editor in chief at Econsultancy, blogger and entrepreneur. I always do my best work when listening to The Fall.’

Nanocontent FTW
What do we mean by nanocontent? We mean the first 11 characters in your tweet / headline. Consider that Google will be able to index part of your tweet in its results headings (the first part). This is a likely SEO ranking factor and it’s persuasive, from a human perspective. Front load those keywords where possible. More on nanocontent and online copywriting here.


HOW TO: Make Facebook Your Company Newsroom


This is great information from Josh Peters on Mashable today and I'm going to share it with the SMMUCLA class next Wednesday!
by Josh Peters12 Comments

Josh Peters is a freelance social media consultant who has been deeply involved in the research and application of social media for several years and is the co-author of TwittFaced. He blogs at Shuaism and would love to connect with you on Facebook, LinkedIn, and/or Twitter().

Having an online newsroom for your company is a very important way to provide information about your business for customers, bloggers, and journalists. Through a well put together newsroom, you can control the story in order to make sure news about your company reflects what you want out in the public. Unfortunately, most corporate newsrooms are boring, static, and sometimes days late getting info up. Facebook can help you change that.


Facebook Fan Pages are perfectly suited for use as company newsrooms because they have a low barrier of entry, high visibility, numerous customization and automation options, and can be put together in an afternoon. A Fan Page can be more engaging and informative than most newsrooms out there, or it can act as an information portal that redirects customers to other, more engaging product Fan Pages. This guide will show you how to use a Fan Page to give your company a voice on Facebook() by creating an interactive newsroom.  Read the rest here



Sunday, September 13, 2009

Social Media Strategy Checklist

Great Post from SocialNetDaily - think I'll incorporate this into the class for discussion and final project.

1. What are we trying to accomplish? Are you looking for more leads, more direct sales, greater brand awareness, conversions, or brand engagement? Understanding what you’re trying to actually do with your social media presence should be the first step in developing a social media strategy.
2. Why social media? Is your audience there? Do you want to build stronger relationships with customers and prospects? Tap into online word-of-mouth channels? Demonstrate that you’re down with the kids? You have a niche audience that’s difficult to reach otherwise? The best way to avoid recklessly jumping on the bandwagon is to examine why the wagon is the best way to get where you’re going before you hop on. Ask yourself: is spending money on social media going to provide better ROI (define) than other forms of advertising you could be spending money on?
3. What kind of social media will help us best achieve our goals? Do you need to utilize social networking sites, blogs, real-time updates (e.g., Twitter), social news sites, media-sharing sites, review/directory sites, virtual worlds, or display ads on social media sites? In some respects, talking about a social media presence is like talking about having an advertising presence: you must specify what you’re doing and where you’re going to place it. Examine the characteristics of the type of social media you want to have a presence on and how those characteristics fit what you’re trying to accomplish to help choose the ones that will work best for you.
4. Are we prepared to let go of control of our brand, at least a little? You can’t participate in social media without being…well…social. And that means engaging in a conversation with customers. Once you engage in a conversation, you have to give up control. Is your company willing to do that?
5. What will we do to encourage participation? There’s nothing more embarrassing than going to a corporate YouTube channel and seeing that the viral video it spent tons of money making has just 127 views. Ditto for going to a company’s Twitter feed and seeing that it has all of 11 followers. What are you planning to do to drive people to your social media presence? And do you have the money to do it?
6. Who will maintain our social media presence? Participating in social media takes a lot of work. You must have something to say and you must have someone (or a team of people) to say it on a regular basis. It won’t happen unless it becomes part of someone’s job. Do you have someone ready to commit a big chunk of time to maintaining your social media presence?
7. Do we have the resources to keep this up, or will this be a short campaign? Similarly, unless you specify that what you’re doing has a limited duration (such as a Twitter feed based on a particular conference), people will expect you to keep it up. Have you budgeted the resources to continue your social media presence beyond the fiscal year?
8. How does engaging users via social media integrate into our overall marketing/communications strategy? None of this stuff exists in a vacuum. It has to be part of a larger marketing/communications strategy. How does social media fit into what you’re trying to do in all your other channels, and how will you use those channels to support each other?
9. How do we measure success? What constitutes failure? Are you measuring views, followers, comments, or subscribers? What’s the threshold for your success metrics that takes them into success territory? What happens if you don’t get there?
10. What will we do less of if we’re spending resources on social media? Chances are you have limited dollars (if not, could you contact me immediately?). If you spend more money on social media and other nontraditional forms of marketing, you have to spend less on something else. How will your overall goals be impacted by taking money away from other forms of advertising/marketing and moving it into social media?

Friday, September 4, 2009

Preparing for Fall 09 Semester

I can't believe it's almost time to welcome a new group of students to Social Media Marketing at UCLA Extension. Class begins on Wednesday, September 23 at 6:30 in Rm 4000A, Math Sciences Bldg. on campus.

Karl Kasca and I team teach and we have an amazing semester planned for everyone. The great news is that the class is now 12 weeks. A little history - the first 2 SMM classes were 1 Day workshops back in 2007. Then we launched a 6 week course in the Fall of 2008, and now, 1 year later, the class is 12 weeks.

Karl and I believe in the Case Study method of teaching which is that we take 'real live' businesses and understand why they do what they do - what's the strategy, the tactics, the best practices and the lessons learned from the case.

We also have guest speakers and this semester we'll have speakers from big brands as well as a very special SPORTS MARKETING opportunity for the class as a whole. Stay tuned for details.

Can't wait - see you soon.